2009-07-09 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

asphalt shingled roof. Mr. Morris asked if Mr. Fenton had reviewed the plan for compliance to the Code. Mr. Fenton stated plan was compliant to the Code but according to the code - the Planning Board determines the side yard setback. Mr. Fenton stated if the Planning Board approves the plan - he will need a set of detailed drawings. It was Stated that the side setback for the building is 7’ at its narrowest and the portion where the addition is going to be built would be 9’. He would actually be building an addition to the storeroom between the existing cooler/freezer unit and the kitchen and then putting a roof over the cooler/freezer, new addition and 8’ open space for compressors. The reason why he wants to extend the roof over the entire space is so they can have a covered walkway when you come out of the new door and go into the door of the cooler/freezer unit. It was stated that the roadway on that side is not used for vehicular traffic - it is mainly a walkway. Mr. Morris asked if the compressor was electric and Mr. Muhlenbruch stated yes it was - and Mr. Morris asked if the noise from it was similar to an air conditioning unit and he stated yes. Mr. Paggi stated he has no concerns with the proposal but he would like to go on the record as saying that there is an existing sanitary sewer trunk line that goes right across the property - reputedly under the existing building. He went on to state that at some point the Village will need to replace it - there are plans in the works as we speak and the Village will need an easement somewhere along the depth of the property from the north to the south - the Village would ask for an easement of about 25’. Mr. Paggi just wanted to make the point that anything the K of C does going East/West will limit the Village’s efforts. The trunk line takes a significant flow from the Village. Mr. Morris asked what the current schedule was to replace it and Mr. Paggi stated that the Village has applied to the Environmental Facilities Corporation for funding in Albany - it is part of a 10 part project - but it is not within the first three that will be done - approximately at the end of 2010. Mr. Kocan recommended that the alleyway be reserved for a potential easement. Mr. Horan asked if the alleyway was attached to another property and Mr. Muhlenbruch stated it goes straight back and meets with another right of way from High Street. Mr. Morris stated that the Planning Board needs to get clarification for the following (1) Does Central Hudson actually have an easement, (2) and if they do have an easement does the building encroach upon the easement. Mr. Fenton stated he felt what had to be done was that the Knights of Columbus needed to contact Central Hudson and mark out the easement. Mr. Morris stated we need to have a record of the easement and secondly we need it marked off so the Planning Board knows that the addition will not encroach upon it. If it does not encroach upon it - then the Planning Board can proceed. Mr. Morris stated the Planning Board just wants official confirmation that they are not allowing construction on top of an easement. To sum things up - Mr. Morris stated that before any approvals are given the Knights of Columbus would have to give the Planning Board (1) a copy of the easement, (2) have the easement marked off and (3) update the site plan. No one was present for the next four items on the agenda. These items are as follows: (1) Proposal from Terri L. Davidson to be able to use a suite at 1562 Route 9 for a Church, (2) Proposal from Joseph V. Cervone to be able to convert back building from MINUTES FROM PLANNING BOARD -3- 7/9/09