Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD <br /> <br />-2- 12/2/04 <br /> <br />what the wattage of the bulbs would be and he stated he was not sure. Mr. Morris then <br />asked applicant to bring in documentation for the file regarding the illumination. At this <br />point Mr. Alfonso made a motion to approve the sign as presented contingent upon <br />applicant supplying the Board with documentation regarding illumination. Motion <br />seconded by Mr. Moran. Unanimously carried. <br /> <br />MARKET STREET INDUSTRIAL PARK <br />Next on the agenda was the proposal for a sign at the entrance to the Market Street <br />Industrial Park. Mrs. Townsend represented the applicant and stated she only had one <br />color rendition of the sign for review. The Board reviewed the color rendition and stated <br />they were pleased with the colors. She also went on to state that they had scaled down <br />the original sign to what the Board had recommended previously. She went on to say <br />that the brick foundation was marked 24" on permit but they may changed to 20" <br />depending on how the brick is laid out. The only change to the sign may be the years in <br />the text portion but the color, size and font would all remain the same. The sign would <br />not be lit and at that point Mr. Morris asked Mrs. Townsend to initial the change on the <br />permit. Mr. Morris also stated if in the future the applicant wanted to have lighting on <br />the sign he would have to come back to the Planning Board for approval. He also asked <br />her to initial the change in size on the original permit. Mr. Moran made a motion to <br />accept the sign as amended, seconded by Mr. Alfonso. Unanimously carried. <br /> <br />VAN VLACK'S CLEANER~S~ 1 FULTON STREET <br />Next on the agenda was the proposal from Van Vlack's Cleaners for a sign for their <br />business. Mr. Van Vlack presented the Board with a color rendition of the sign. The <br />Board was very pleased with the way the sign looked. He stated it would not be lit but he <br />understands that in the future if he chooses to light it he would have to come back to the <br />Board. The Board then reviewed the permit for conformance to the code. It was stated <br />that all was in conformance. Mr. Moran made a motion to approved the sign as <br />presented, seconded by Mr. McCormick. Unanimously carried. <br /> <br />SEXY IN THE CITY~ BANK PLAZA~ ROUTE 9 <br />Next on the agenda was the sign proposal by Sexy in the City. Applicant was asked to <br />bring in exact color samples (black and white are not necessary). Applicant was <br />informed of the sign requirements. She was also told that the Board would need the <br />dimensions of the sign for conformance to the codes. She was also informed that she <br />would need to put in an application. There was not enough details for the sign to be <br />approved. <br /> <br />Next on the agenda was the discussion on the use of the space. She stated that it would <br />be an upscale boutique - featuring primarily lingerie, accessories, drcor - she would also <br />be doing nails and have a tanning salon. She would not be doing the nails or tanning - <br />she would be renting space. She stated that the bathrooms would he staying as they are - <br />the only construction would be to install partitions. Mr. McCormick asked about <br />chemicals and if they would dispose of them down the sink and she answered no she <br /> <br /> <br />