2000-10-05 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTE~ OF PI~NN1NG BOARD -2- 10/5/00 because there is FtL4 block that runs the perimeter and increases it 8 inches and what that does is it brought him up out of tbe ground towards the front and he had to put in two steps. After that he decided to put in an awning/canopy over the top of the steps. He reconfigured the parking where the at grade entrance is in the rear of the building and that is where the handicap parking spots are located Mr. Alfonso asked applicant if there wouM be sign on the canopy and he answered just the number of the address. There will be a small placard up against the door with his name on it and company name. He was reminded that when and if he gets more tenants he is only allowed so much signage and he answered he understood He stated he will be putting in planters in the front. He stated his deed has no cross-easement for the telephone company to use his property for access. He stated he would be closing the gate between the two properties permanently because that is where parking spaces will be located. Mr. Karge asked applicant to put in writing the statement about the cross-easements as above written. Applicant was asked to stripe the handicap spot and detail it according to ADA standards on plan. Mr. Alfonso made a motion to accept the amended site plan as presented, seconded by Mr. Consentino. Unanimously carried JOSEPH LOMONACO FOR 16 ACRE PARCEL ON CHANNINGVILLE ROAD Next on the agenda was informal appearance by Mr. LoMonaco for subdivision discussion on Channingville Road. The property is located on the east side of Channingville Road. It is a 16. 4 acre parceL The topography is anywhere from gentle to steep. He stated he had a soil scientist walk the property and he found no wet lands on the property or within lOO fi. Of the property. He stated there wouM have to be some soil borings done down the road to determine the depth of the rock on the property. There is an existing right of way but it may only be a water/se~er easement. The title company will have to determine if it is an actual right of way. There are sewer and water lines that run to the property. The majority of the property (about $0%) is in the RM~-I zone and the remaining property is in the R12. 5 zone. Mr. Karge asked if this would be affected by the Musterplan and Ms. Sassmann stated they are recommending that the RM-] portion of the property be rezoned to R12.5. She went on to state that the Musterplan is concerned about tra~fflc in the area and also water pressure in the area. Trustee Juliano stated that the residents of the area would like to see single family dwellings in the area and he also agreed with this determination. Ms. Sassmann went on to state that she works with the Wappinger Greenway Trail_and she stated that applicant should be aware that the trail is very close to the property and she suggest that he keeps this in mind when developing the property and clearing the land. Mr. MiWhell stated that one of the considerations wouM be the steep slope - don't scalp it off and put houses there and ruin the vista for the residents - it is quite scenic. Applicant stated he would like to come to one more meeting informally to show the revised pla~ CURB CUT. 2 FULTON STREET Next on the agenda is a request for a recommendation from the Board of Trustees regarding a curb cut for 2 Fulton Street. Mr. Karge stated he had reviewed the situation and stated that what