2000-06-01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD -2- 6/t/00 only 150 ff deep. There is a dedicated service road that mm between the front lot and the rear lot. It is a right of way owned by the Village and as such it can be used by the residents on both sides but you cannot put anything permanent on the right of way. Mr. Morris stated the only concerns he had were the chemicals and control there of- any vapors or smells must be taken care of because there are residential houses abutting the property. Applicant stated he has a dry cleaning business now and he know he must comply with all EPA standards. He stated there would be no emissions - everything is totally enclosed. Mr. Visentin stated that the previous applicant for this property had gone to the DOT and talked with Mr. Faucher and he did have a curb cut and access to the property. Applicant was asked to revisit the DOT and make sure he does have a curb cut and access to the property. Mr. Karge stated he supports the concept and Mr. Visentin stated he feels it would be a good addition to the neighborhood. Mr. Morals asked applicant to keep in mind the amount of landscaping that is required by code and applicant stated he has made allowances for it on both sides. Mr, Visentin stated he felt it would be better if the parking would be in the rear because it presents a nicer building and it is more aesthetically pleasing. Mr, Morris asked about the signs on the parcel and applicant stated once he gets into the proposal a little bit more he would check to see what is allowed. He stated there would not be any bright or glaring signs - there would be a sign with the light projecting onto the sign not the sign emitting any light. Mr. Karge asked what the days and hours of operation would be and applicant stated it would be ti'om 7:00 am to 7:00 p.m, - the dry cleaner would be closed on Sunday but the laundromat would be open 7 days a week. Applicant also stated the laundromat part of the business may stay open until 9:00, Mr, Paggl asked what the Planning Board's policy as far as parking goes? The actual parking requirement for the proposal is 40 spaces which applicant feels is way more than he ever anticipates on using, Mr. Paggi asked if the Planning Board had the ability to waive a certain amount of parking spaces? Mr. Visentin stated the Planning Board does have an option to forego the rigid parking spaces if there is additional space available for the future if the applicant would need additional parking, Mr. Visentin stated what could be done is that they would look at the retail space and calculate that on the required parking and then look at the other uses on site with a little different slant so the Planning Board could come up with a number that is acceptable to all. Mr. Visentin also stated that applicant would have to provide a landscaping and lighting plan to the Pla~ing Board, BILL KARR ]FOR $0 SOUTH AVENUE Next on the agenda was the appearance of Mr. William Kan' with a proposal to add a third apartment to 30 South Avenue which currently has two apactments, Mrs. Kart presented the plan. It was stated that the property is currently zoned R7.5 which is single family residential with a 7,500 sq. ft. minimum lot size, The deli that was previously there was