Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINUTES OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING HELD MARCH 11, 2009 <br /> <br />Present: Lloyd Frink, Chairman, Frank Barresi, Vice Chairman, Scott Davis, George <br />Dansereau <br />Absent: Allen Firstenberg <br />Others Present: Adam Lauricella, Mike Novick, Jay and Dana VanBenschoten, Paul Pilon, John <br />Fenton, Jim Horan, John Kelly, Esq., Nigel and Alison Taylor, Shane Cashman, <br />JAY AND DANA VANBENSCHOTEN, 2559 SOUTH AVENUE <br />First on the agenda was the request of Jay and Dana Van Benschoten/MDM Realty of Dutchess <br />51 MacGhee Road, Poughkeepsie, NY seeking the following variances to be able to have a third <br />apartment in a property that is a two family house located within two family zoning (house is <br />located in an NB zone) at 2559 South Avenue. Applicant is seeking a use variance to be able to <br />have a three family house in two family zoning. The applicant is also seeking the following area <br />variances: (1) required is 750 sq. ft. per dwelling unit and proposed is 587 sq. ft. per dwelling <br />unit and (2) required is 13,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size and existing is 9,396 sq. ft. Secretary <br />stated that Dutchess County Department of Planning had responded to the zoning referral with a <br />matter of local concern comment. Secretary also stated that legal notice had been published in <br />the February 19, 2009 Poughkeepsie Journal and given to secretary proof of mailing to <br />neighbors. Mr. Paul Pilon, architect for the project spoke on behalf of the owners. He stated <br />that applicants inherited the property about 8 months ago – it is a two family unit – at the present <br />time the third level is being used by the occupants of the second floor apartment. Because of the <br />existing roof configuration and a lack of maintenance prior to them obtaining the property – the <br />roof has been leaking on the upper level and it has damaged the roof, the roof structure and a <br />good portion of the second floor apartment (walls and ceilings). Since the building does need a <br />roof – the applicants are proposing to reframe it so that they can correct some of the deficiencies <br />that are collecting water and make a better roof that sheds water – they will not be changing the <br />footprint of the building – there will not be any additions out the sides, etc. As it currently exists <br />the second floor unit cannot be rented – there is too much damage. They are estimating that the <br />repairs will be about $100,000.00. In addition to that the expenses for the building are running <br />about $25,000.00 per year and being limited to only one unit the income from the building is <br />about $13,000.00 per year. Applicants would like to get the variances to get the third unit in and <br />offset the expenses. The area variance for the apartment is 163 sq. ft. however, all of the rooms <br />that will be used for the unit do comply with the residential code of the State of New York. As <br />far as the lot size variance – the applicants would like to point out that there is sufficient room <br />behind the building on the lot as it currently stands for at least 6 vehicles and the building does <br />exceed the minimum parking requirements (required for 3 apartments is 4.5 or 5 spaces). He <br />also stated he does not feel the request will have an impact on the neighborhood as the use is still <br />residential. <br />Mr. Frink asked if there was presently dwelling space in the attic and Mr. Pilon answered the <br />space may have a current Certificate of Occupancy – he is not sure – again he is stating that there <br /> <br />