Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINUTES OF PLANNING BOARD MEETING HELD SEPTEMBER 3, 2015 <br /> <br />Present: Tom Morris, Chairman, Bonnie Kieffer, Vice Chair, Don McCormick, Bob <br />Relyea, Mike Kocan, George Moran and Mary Ann Loncto, Secretary <br /> <br />Others Present: <br /> Harry Strang Bill Povall <br /> Trustee Komornik Trustee Huber <br /> Christine Contelmo Nick Contelmo <br /> <br />Meeting was called to order at 7:03 p.m. The meeting minutes from the August 6, 2015 meeting <br />left <br />Were reviewed – Page 1 line 6 under Best Tile Plaza should read, “….there should be a hand <br />turn only…….”, Page 2, line 8 under Dutchess Shopping Plaza should read, “….The north and <br />sout <br />h end reconstruction…..”, Page 3, third paragraph, line 2 should read, “…the addition will <br />asMs <br />match much of the…..”, Page 4, line 1 should read, “…. Kieffer made a…..”, Page 4, <br />on the agenda <br />Second paragraph, line 1 should read, “…..Next the…..” and last line should <br />Ms <br />read, “……Motion was seconded by . Kieffer…..” Mr. McCormick made a motion to <br />approve the minutes as amended, seconded by Ms. Kieffer. Mr. Morris, Ms. Kieffer, Mr. <br />McCormick, Mr. Relyea and Mr. Moran all voted aye and Mr. Kocan abstained. <br /> <br />BEST TILE PLAZA (FORMERLY LAFAYETTE PLAZA), 1671 ROUTE 9 <br />First on the agenda was a proposal for an amended site plan for the Best Tile Plaza, 1671 Route <br />9. Mr. Harry Strang, representing the owners of the plaza was present. It was stated that the <br />plans that are being reviewed do not incorporate any of the most recent comments from the <br />Consultants. Greenplan, Inc.,’s review letter dated August 31, 2015 (copy on file in the <br />Planning/Zoning offices) was discussed. Again it was stated that the project was classified as a <br />Type II Action on August 6, 2015. It was stated that note #3 on the Landscaping Plan should <br />read, “Owner of record shall maintain landscaping, replace dead plants and mulch on an annual <br />basis.” Mr. Strang then discussed the lighting. He submitted a test report entitled, “Photometric <br />testing and evaluation in accordance with LM79-2000” (copy of this report is on file in the <br />Planning/Zoning offices). In order to show the Board the exact light he would be using, he <br />brought one with him to the Board meeting. It was stated that the radiation of the light is all <br />downward. He also submitted a report for the PTLK-90 Intencity Lighting (he will be using <br />PTLK-60) which explains that it is a replacement for higher wattage metal halide post top lamps. <br />(A copy of this report is also on file in the Planning/Zoning offices). He also stated that they <br />have a 10 ft. pole where a maximum of 20 ft. is permitted. All lighting will be contained on the <br />subject property. It was stated that he would need 16 trees per the code and his plan shows a <br />mixture of 16 trees (small, medium and large). There should also be a note on the site plan that <br />states all non-essential outdoor lighting will be time controlled. Ms. Greig stated that she is <br />satisfied with the types of plantings that are proposed but feels applicant should add some <br />additional trees to the smaller islands. It was stated that the plans have been updated to show left <br />turn only, there is also new curbing directing left turn only (anyone exiting from the rear of the <br />property is directed to make a left turn only to avoid delivery trucks going through Village <br />streets). Ms. Greig suggested that a note be added to the landscaping plan stating that the caliber <br />of trees should be 2 ½” at the time of planting. It was stated that applicant should keep the <br />thunder cloud trees in the parking lot and go to pear on road and along northern boundary. Mr. <br /> <br />