Laserfiche WebLink
<br />MINUTES OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING HELD JUNE 9, 2015 <br /> <br />Present: Allen Firstenberg, Chairman, Heidi Murphy, Rachel DiGrazia, Frank Barresi and <br />Attorney Viglotti <br /> <br />Absent: Bridget Gannon and Hilda Duque <br /> <br />Others Present: <br /> Trustee Komornik Trustee Huber <br /> Dave Stenger Brian Watts <br /> <br /> <br />Meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. <br /> <br />110 MARKET STREET, LLC FOR 110 MARKET STREET <br />First on the agenda was the public hearing on the request of 110 Market Street, LLC (c/o Dave <br />Stenger), 167 Meyers Corners Road, Suite 102, Wappingers Falls, NY 12590 seeking an area <br />variance from the maximum side yard setback for a principal building (required is 12 ft. and <br />requested is 15 ft.) for a two family dwelling to be located at 110 Market Street. Property is <br />located in a RMU (Residential Mixed Use) zone and identified on the tax map as: 6158-17- <br />138130-0000. Mr. Dave Stenger (Owner of the property and developer) and Mr. Brian Watts, <br />Engineer were present. Applicants provided proof of publication of the legal notice in the May <br />29, 2015 edition of the Poughkeepsie Journal and proof of mailing legal notice to all property <br />owners within a 200 ft. radius by certified mail. Dutchess County Department of Planning <br />responded to the zoning referral with a “matter of local concern.” There are no outstanding debts <br />or violations against this property. Mr. Firstenberg asked Mr. Stenger if he had any objection to <br />proceeding with four Board members as the Board was currently awaiting the alternate member <br />and Mr. Stenger stated he had no objection. Applicant stated he had removed an existing trailer <br />form the property and is proposing to construct a two family house. They are proposing to have <br />a 12 ft. wide driveway to access the parking in the rear – there will be a total of four parking <br />spaces. There will also be a catch basin in the middle of the driveway to help with drainage. <br />The entire paved area will be pervious asphalt which will also alleviate any type of drainage <br />problems. There will be a small green space in the lower end of the property with a picnic table <br />and buffer plantings around the outside of the parking to separate adjoining properties. The <br />building will be a 30’ x 32’ building duplex structure with a front porch. The property will be <br />served by municipal water and sewer. They are seeking a 3 ft. variance. The driveway is 12 ft. <br />wide with 1 ½ ft on each side of it to the property line and to the building. Mr. Firstenberg asked <br />why the 1 ½ ft. on each side of the driveway and applicant answered he wanted to be able to <br />have some green space and not have the vehicles parked right against the building. He also <br />stated it would be necessary for snow removal. Mr. Barresi asked what the width of a standard <br />driveway was and applicant answered 12 ft. The units are set up side by side with access from <br />both the front and the back. Mr. Firstenberg stated regarding undesirable changes to the <br />neighborhood – the surrounding area is all residential. The area is zoned residential/mixed use – <br />and the reason he choose to do residential is that the width of the lot is only 52’ and is not <br />conducive to doing much else. Mr. Firstenberg then asked if there was any other way he could <br />have gotten tenants to the parking area instead of the proposed driveway and he stated no there <br /> <br />