1982-10-25 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A meeting was held on 10-25-82 at 7:00 m.M. in the Mesier Homestead to discuss the issuance of a building permit to ~lr. & Mrs. ~rmstrong for the property located at I69 %Jest Main Rt. for office space. ~resent: ~layor ~ynnett~ Tr. Greco, Tr. Ciopga, Tr. Costa~ Tr. Mazochi, yr. Carey & Atty. misanel!i. Other residents also present made part of the file;. Motion by Tr. Costa, seconded by Tr. Grec~ that Mr. Gerald Pisanella be retained by the Village to represent the Village in any matters which may prove to be a conflict for the Village Atty. Carried. May~r Synnett inquired as to how a permit was issued to Mr. & ~Xrs. Armstron9 for the premises at 169 West Main St. Zoning Officer Haubennestel reported he will have to 9o back to initial time when people requested a permit. He stated people were told there was difficulty with the premises in getting the Board to grant a variance. Mr. Haubennestel reported 2 previous uses were proposed: 1) Restaurant, 2) Hairdresser, and the County ~lannir~ Board recommended against both changes. He stated zoning change would have to 9o to the Planning Ooard for an opportunity to decide on which recommendation. Mr. Haubennestgl repc~ted County Planning Board left decision for a zoninN change to local judgement. He stated several meetings were held and recommendations made wi~h the final recommendation from the ?lanning B.oard that the property be rezoned Office Business. Mr,.l{aubennestel reported Mr. & Mrs. Armstrong requested zoning change to General Business and after a ~ublic Nearing was held, application was denied. He stated that~ in response to a letter f~om the Armstrongs, he wrote them and outlined permitted accessory uses in con~unction with the mermitted Principal Uses for professional offices under Section 420-A . of the Zoning Ordinance under Residential Districts. Mr. Haubennestel discussed provisions outlined in the above section and stated, based on the above, he issued building permit. He reported he later received a communication from the Armstrongs that they wanted to make permanent changes and plans were reviewed and revised. ~r. Haubennestel repo~ted that when revised plan had been received amd reviewed by he a~d Mr. Galioto a letter of agreement was signed. He stated he received a notice of a meeting on 10-21-8~ and m~t with Mr. Pisanelli on 10-24-82. Mr. misanelli stated there was no rezonin9 and Mr. Haubennestel replied request had been denied and property was zoned Residential, He stated he was interpreting permitted accessory uses and building permit was issued based o~ the assumption that they would comply, with requirements. Mr. Haubennestel reported that if not, gertificate of Occupancy will not be issued.