Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HELD <br />AT MESIER HOMESTEAD, WAPPINGERS FALLS, NEW YORK - MARCH 8, 1988 <br /> <br />Present: <br /> <br />Chairman Frank Savelli, Robert Smith, George Casey, <br />Sterling VanWagenen, Deputy Zoning Enforcement <br />Anthony Pacio, Attorney Louis Viglotti <br /> <br />Absent: Kenneth Kane <br /> <br />Others Present: <br /> Harry Greco, Trustee, Roy Avenue, Wappingers Falls <br /> Samuel Iannone, Three Star Anodizing, Wappingers Falls <br /> Harold Reilly, 107 East Main Street, Wappingers Falls <br /> <br />Chairman Savelli called meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. Mr. Van- <br />Wagenen moved that the minutes of meeting held February 2, 1988 <br />be approved as written and received by all members by mail, <br />~seconded by Mr. Casey and unanimously carried. <br /> <br />SAMUEL IANNONE, THREE STAR ANODIZING <br /> <br />Chairman Savelli advised that the first order of business would be <br />the holding of a public hearing on request of Samuel Iannone for <br />a use variance to allow the continuation of the existing signs <br />used as a directive to the Sears Pickup Center at the Market Street <br />Industrial Park. Said signs are now located on the Cuccia building <br />at One East Main Street and at the corner of Fulton and Market <br />Streets. The legal notice had been placed in the Southern Dutchess <br />News and all property owners within a radius of 200' from Mr. <br />Iannone's property had been notified of the public hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Harold Reilly, attorney representing Samuel Iannone, owner <br />of the property which is leased by Sears, explained that the <br />signs are located at crucial locations directing customers to <br />the Sears building, and that without the directional signs, it <br />would be very difficult for people to find the building. Mr. <br />Reilly advised that there was some indication that without the <br />signs, Sears might not lease the space in the bleachery. <br /> <br />Mr. viglotti, Village attorney, noted that an interpretation of <br />the Zoning Ordinance had been requested and questioned Mr. Reilly <br />if he had been cited by anyone in the Village government. Mr. <br />Reilly stated that his client had received a letter from the <br />Zoning Office which stipulated that the signs were illegal and <br />Mr. Iannone would require a variance in order to continue the <br />signs at the locations. <br /> <br />Mr. Viglotti explained that the Zoning Ordinance of the Village <br />dictates that a sign placed on a premises in the Village may <br />advertise only the use of that particular premises. Mr. Viglotti <br />stated that the applicant had cited a case from the Supreme Court <br />of Putnam County which stands for the proposition that the type of <br /> <br /> <br />