1993-09-14 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

~.0F ZONING ]80~I) OF ~ ]~ING }r~l.O 9/1~/93 Present: Rok~rt Smith, Robex~ Lewis, Ha~ Greco, Cathy Regan, Jenny Bovine and Max7 Ann Bolander, Secretary Others Present Janet Gardell Ed Baecher Tony Di~3mizio Dan Contelmo Eileen Mas terson E~-ic Gardell I~u Benedett~3 Tony Patio Beb Kemp Jack Shay MeetinE was called to order at 7:33 p.m. Met. ion by Regan. seconded by Ms. Bovine to accept t~e minutes of August which were received by all members by ,~il was made. Unanimousl¥ carried. FRANK ~ 2O GARD~ STREET. ~ Fa*.~. NY First on the agenda was the application o~ ~r. ~rank Scianna 20 Garden Street seeki~ ~ inte~retation to Section 210 "Definitions - Lot Width" for Lot $2 and variance sections ~11.5, "I~sul~ly Shard Lots and ~11.6 "New ~aildings on Lots ~vi~ Less T~n the Min~ Area." Secreta~f read legal notice which appea~d in the Southe~ ~tchess News and advised t~t all neighbors within a 200 radius had received a copy of legal notice. Secreta~7 also i~fo~ed Board that E~tchess Co~mty Depa~nt of Pla~i~ had ~sponded to zonir~ refe~al with a "~tter of local Mr. Gardell presented the plan and stated t~at the lot is 78 square Feet total but t~e average lot width is not reguired 75 sqx~are feet in all places. After VillaEe Attorney reviewed the print he advised Board ti%at no variance was necessary. Mr. Gardell as a licensed surveyor could certify t~at the lot is 78 square feet in t. ot~l and put this infelwnation on a certified plan. M~-. Gardell testified to the fact t~at indeed the lot was 78 sq. ft. in total and he stated he would note this fact on t~e plan. NTC A~ BODY. 33 1~ ~ WB_PPINGE~ FALLS. ~ Next on the a~enda was the continuation of a public hearin~ originally held last month on the re.est of ~. Ed Baecher, 33 Market Street, d/b/a ~C Auto Body seeki~ a variance to be allowed to park more vehicles on prope~y than allowed by code. Letter was read fr,~ the [watohess County ~pa~nt of Planni~ dated A~ust 20, 1993 which stated that the Board should view this application as am oppo~unity to ~prove the appearance of the site and reco~ended that the ~ard rely on its o~ study of the facts in this case with consideration of the D~pa~ent's ~nts in renderir~ a decision.