Laserfiche WebLink
Workshop meeting held Wednesday, July 18,1984 at 7:00 p.m. at the <br />Village Hall on Spring Street. <br /> <br />Present: Mayor Synnett, Trustees BoYle, Carey, Cioppa, Costa, Greco~ <br />and Mazochi, Attorney: Reilly, Engineer Lapar. <br />Also present: Rose Horton of the Recreation Commission, and <br />John Middlebrooks of the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation <br />and Historic Preservation. <br /> <br />The purpose of the meeting was to discuss the possibility of funding <br />recreation facilities under the Land and Water Conservation Fund grants. <br /> <br />Mr. Middlebrooks explained that approximately $2M available in the <br />Taconic Region, and that competition for the funds will be considerable. <br />Proposed projects will be evaluated according to a criteria {hat <br />identifies user intensive facilities to meet outdoor recreation needs~ <br />(e.g., swimming pools, tennis courts). <br />He further explained that the program is a matching grant; certain <br />factors will be given high priority. Among these considerations are <br />access to the Hudson River, improved handicapped access~ and year <br />round facility use. <br />The grant funds projects such as park land acquisition, development of <br />new facilities, and facilities improvements. <br />Discusion was held to identify potential projects. In response to <br />various questions, Mr. Middlebrooks stated that court ga~es are con- <br />sidered user intensive and would receive priority, as would a boat <br />launch, particularly if it increased access to the River. <br />Trustees Greco and Mazochi inquired about installing lighting at the <br />fields. <br />Mr. Middlebrooks stated that while lighting would extend the use of the <br />facilities, it was considered an ancillary expense rather than a <br />priority improvement. He also explained that the subsequent increased <br />utility costs would be a maintainance charge and not fundable under t his <br />project. <br />Trustee Cioppa inquired about the installation of sanitary facilities. <br />Mr. Middlebrooks stated that this too was an ancillary cost amd that <br />portion of a project would receive a pro-rated priority. He also drew <br />a distinctionbetween fencing to enclose a facility, which would be an <br />eligible cost, and fencing around a ballfield or baseline fencing, <br />which would not. <br />Engineer Lapaz asked about the application requirements. <br />Mr. Middlebrooks indicated that they were somewhat extensive. As the <br />progra~ involves an allocation of Federal funds, all Federal guidelines <br />would be required; specifically Davis-Bacon wage schedules, NEPA a~d <br />SEQ~A environmental requirements, archaeological clearance from the <br />State Office for Historic Preservation, etc. He mentioned that the <br />application deadline was August 31,1984. <br />Mrs. Horton said that it was unlikely that the engineering specifications <br />and cost estimates could be completed by that date. <br />Mr. Middlebrooks indicated that the first step in preparing a grant <br />application would be the adoption of a Village Master Plan for Recreation. <br />In light of the problems involved in meeting SHPO requirements and anti- <br />cipated questions from the N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation, the <br />consensus of the Board was not to submit an application this year, but to <br />plan for next year. <br />The meeti ~g adjourned at 8:15 p.m. <br /> R.~,~p_ ec~f u 1 ly submi~ted, <br /> ~ son <br /> age clerk <br /> <br /> <br />