1984-08-29 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

A Workshop session on the proposed Rte. 9 project was held on 8-29-84 at 7:00 P.M. Present: Hr. Purdy A. Halstead, N¥S DOT Pro~ect Engineer, Hr. Mastropietro, NYS DOT, W.H, Kihillus~ NYS DOT, Town Councilman Joseph ,Incoronato, Town Council women Irene Paino & ~enata Ballard. Town Supervisor Versace, 5~ayor Synnett, Tr. Boyle, Tr. Costa, Tr. Mazochi,Tr. Cioppa, Atty. Reilly and Eng. Wall. blayor Synnett re~orted there was a problem by the bridge and he was concerned with traffic. He reported Village was dissatisfied with the Rte. 9D project in that many of the signs have not been replaced. Mr. Mastropietro, reported Public Hg. held a~d comments have been researched regarding environmental assessment. He stated preference was Alternate A and major concern was the Mancini property. Hr. Mastropie~ro reported elevation of roadway had a lOWer profile of 2' as criteria changed rega~ding flood level. He stated there would be 2' less embankment in lake and the installation of a retaining wall at the Hancini property. Mr. Hastropietro reported Plan A had a significant impac~ on the area and exposure could be reduced by moving project further away from bld9. Mayor Synnett reported they would be working on the dam next week and wanted debris kept out of lake. Mr. Kihillus reported reason for the meeting was to bring everyone up to date on the project. He stated after Public Hg. they have to make a response. He stated detailed information is significant as it has an impact on the lake and the Mancini property. Mr. Kihillus reported Village and Town agreed on Alternate A and this refined profile concerning alignment across the lake. He stated he asked real estate people to make another survey concerning right of way impact and requested impact on the ~ancini property. He reported Mr. Hancini conCOcted State-officials in re: to impact on his property a~d real estate people re-evaluated property but he could not Give the figures. Hr. Kihillus stated Mancini could still stay in business but parkinG and septic would be effected by Alternate A. They were told by Hancini that he might seek court action and Alternate B might be acceptable to him. He stated they had a slight modification to Alternate A that alters the impact on the lake slightly. He reported changing profile 2' automatically has impact on lake. Supervisor Versace reported Alternate A was in the best interest of the Town and Village and State vowed they would work closely with the municipalities. He stated he didn't appreciate outside interference or being pressured by one business. He reported Alternate A would have the least impact on the Town and Village and felt strongly at the Public Hg. and gave his position. He reported State should be concerned with all businesses and residences along Rte. 9