Laserfiche WebLink
MIlJTES GF ~ BGARD GF AFPEAI~ MEE~'~I I~I~ 4l t o1~7 <br />Preseat: Frank Bau~resi, ~ hair~mar~, eott Davis, Allen Firstenberg, George I~ansereau and <br />Scott Greer, , <br />Absent: Lloyd Ft~k <br />tither Present: <br />Anna I~1Po~lto ran I)lPolltn <br />Floyd ~Tood ~awna Chase <br /> <br />Tom V~ebber t <br />Bill Ruche .' <br />~'~ R~aiche Laude Webber <br />~e~dl Murphy ~r~an ~u~hy <br />Barbara ~`olins Rudy Tomlin <br />Barbaro Passaro Stever walk <br />Angel Barron Fred DiBerto <br />a~ ~1Bert4 ~an~t Barrel <br />Gary Rogers Kevin ~Iuber <br />Robert Tonllins <br />Meeting was called to order at ~; 3 ~ p.rn. <br />FILE <br />~~ ,i1RIE _AN~ M ~B,~ER~„ l~ELA„VE~E ~V~NU <br />First on the agenda was the public hearing on the request of Laurie and Torn Webber, ~8 Jackson ~aad, <br />l~oughkepsie seeking a use variance from Section 11- l CBS of the honing Grdinance to able to <br />havc a residence in their building at 19 ~elavergne Avenue wl~ch is a ptolubitod use in the General <br />Business ~GB~ gone. ~-pplicant gave secre#ary copies of lad notice that had been ~ property <br />owners and a copy ~#` an afl~davit of publication that legal ~aa~ was published in March ~, 7 <br />edition of Poughkeepsie Journal. It was also wed that I~uhess County Ipt. of Planning had <br />responded to the coning referral with ~ `fitter of local concern'} cornn~ent~ Mrs, Webber stated she <br />had spoken with the previous bode Enforcement Gf~icer r. Bruiting who stated it was permissible to <br />havc the residence at l Detavcrgne Avenue so she went into contract with Mr. Angel Barns. It was <br />the discovered xt was not within bode ~ be able ~ have a residence at 1 ~ ~elavergne Avenue. Mr. <br />Barron would like to have a cabinet business and he and his family would like reside in the house on <br />the property. l~Ie would be building a 3 Duo sy. ~. building on the pro~Y fir his business, Mrs, <br />Webber stated that she has had the property for sate fur ~ '~~ years but had a rental payment there fir 1 ~ <br />cr~ths, They havc spent approximately 4,0 for the past ~ % years which includes mortgage, <br />taxes, waxer bx~l~ garbage and landscaping mow grass etc.. Mt. Ba~resi s#at~d the Board would need <br />copies of all bills far theix review, Mrw ~irstenberg exiled to applicant that oue of the cti#eria that <br />the Board will fudge the are~quest on is whether or not y able to make a reasole return firorn the <br />property as it is now. Mr. Barr~si stated the neat test is unique circum.~tanes - he asked applicant <br />what she felt was unique about the property -applicant answered that the building that is on the <br />pmPe~Y lends itself very well to ahome - it was previously used as a residence before the applicants <br />pur~hf~d the property lI1 ~ ~~~ and ~~~lvert~d It to Mr. V~ebber's plumbing business. It is a rued use <br />area with residences and businesses sun~ound~g the property. Mr. Barron stated he would have one <br />employes plus himself to start ~ they arc custom made cabinets -there would be no sale of the cabinets <br />Exam the site and no showroom on site. Mrs. Webber stated she has carne dawn considerably ~ pace <br />the past ~ years ~ she has also marketed the house through her Real Estate Agency ahd with <br />advertiserner~ts in the ~ennysaver. <br />~ d 504 ~ ~8~9~ ' ~1~I~~~ : 4 ' 1~B~ : 4 ~~~~ ~~ ABM ~ 1 ~1~ ~ W~~~ <br />